Kodak ultramax 400 reddit. 8 50mm - kodak ultramax 400 upvotes .

Kodak ultramax 400 reddit View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. I only shot Ultramax once and was pleasantly surprised - sometimes I wish I had more rolls of them because a 400 ISO Film to load into a point and shoot would be perfect instead of wasting an expensive film like Portra for that. The H35 is a fixed 22mm lens with a fixed aperture of f9. The emulsion has changed slightly since the rebrand, but the rebate remains. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now Im thinking about pushing Kodak Ultramax 400 to 800 or Fuji X-tra 400 to 800. It'll be great. Ultramax is definitely grainy, being 400 speed, but to me that looks more like the typical epson flatbed scanner noise. It's Kodak. It's +1 stop on ISO 400. I found that metering the exposure and then adding half of what the meter says to the total exposure worked well. ) so it would surprise me if they were. Over here even camera shops sell stuff like ColorPlus for £15, which is obscene. It's Ultramax. Film photography subreddit. "GA" is the fomer Gold 100 that was discontinued sometime around 2010. Alternative Photography process discussion is also welcome. Ultramax 400 pushed Posted by u/DuckAdmirable4684 - 145 votes and 34 comments The data sheets says "not before 1 second, and maybe after that", but the Big Honkin' List of B&W and Color tables from 2002 says "No" below 10 seconds, and NR (which I assume is not rated) from 10 to 100. Technically it's a 200% difference but practically less than 10% I'd say. I haven't seen any real comparisons out yet. (There are rumors that Lomo 100 is the same/similar to gold 200, and Lomo 100 is my fav "cheap film") Ultramax 400 is similar but I don't see the need to use a 400 speed film over 200 especially since it is more expensive. 5 and 1/100 shutter speed. 8 50mm - kodak ultramax 400 upvotes r/Darkroom is Reddit's best place for discussions on film developing, printing, toning and hand Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Not sure if this is common knowledge yet like it was with Gold 200/Fuji 200, but it seems as though the “new” made in America Fuji 400 is in fact, plain old Ultramax 400. 99AUD) Can I push this Kodak film to 800iso and achieve decent results? I'll mainly be taking photos in the streets (suburbs/city) and some landscapes No prob, and yeah that’s a bummer. So I shot a roll of Kodak Ultramax 400, with the majority of the photos at night. Or check it out in the app stores   kodak colorplus 200 and the kodak ultramax 400) Personally I like Gold 200 slightly more than Proimage 100, it feels warmer and slightly more contrasty. 4 1/60th on my k1000 with Ultramax. Related Topics Photography (Reddit) . Terms & Policies Kodak Ultramax 400. Or check it out in the app stores     TOPICS [Kodak Ultramax 400] imgur. In these two shots you’ve linked via Imgur, the contrast is very high and the dark shadows can get noisy in a scan. We did a quick fairly boring test to confirm this. Reddit iOS Reddit Android Reddit Premium About Reddit Advertise Blog Careers Press. But how can I prevent underexposing the film? Sure, Ultramax has the exposure latitude to cope in most circumstances, but you don't get the low-light benefits you were looking for when you set your camera to 800 - might even have been better to just leave it at 400. You’ll never be getting the most out of 35mm with a flatbed, but assuming it’s exposed correctly Kodak Gold 200 is "GB" (Gold, version B, 200 ISO) while Ultramax is "GC" (Gold, version C, 400 ISO). For the long exposure I used this app called Reciprocity+ ($1 or something on iPhone, there’s some free apps on android that do the same) and I used the basic color negative 400 ISO setting (since Ultramax isn’t in there). My assumption is that Fuji outsourced production of Fuji 400 unfinished formula (no 4th layer) to Kodak, as there is no other company that could produce this film. I would recommend Ultramax. Also, any beginner tips would be greatly appreciated :) Archived post. Kodak Gold my go to film nowadays (if I can’t get my hands on Portra) - the price-quality just unbeatable. It's ISO 400. UltraMax may be your most affordable ISO 400 colour film option. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. r/Darkroom is Reddit's best place for discussions on film developing, printing, toning and hand-coloring prints, darkroom techniques, equipment and more. Jun 11, 2023 · Kodak UltraMax 400 is a medium-speed, fine-grained colour-negative film. Or check it out in the app stores Ultramax 400 > Portra 400, change my mind Share Sort by: Best I'm currently deciding between Kodak Ultramax 400, Gold 200, Colorplus 200 and Pro Image 100. I find myself using both often being they are the Same, I was searching for best places to buy online via reddit and found an old thread. For discussion of how to shoot film, buying advice, or what went wrong on your first roll head on over to /r/analogcommunity. The main drawback is there is no information online about reciprocity failure. r/Darkroom is Reddit's best place for discussions on film developing, printing, toning and hand-coloring prints, darkroom techniques, equipment and more Hey, So now that the new north American fuji 400 is on the shelves, has anybody done any real world shooting with it yet to see what kind of character it has, or if it's basically ultramax 400? Everybody online seems to have an opinion quickly about the fuji 200/kodak gold thing when that fuji came out. I've read mixed opinions online, apparently it's either love it or hate it. Ultramax has a bit more saturation and contrast than more professional grade films like Portra 400 or Pro400H. It has the DX code 915373 and is developed using the regular C-41 process. I just picked up a Pentax Me Super and the only available film in my budget is Kodak Ultramax 400 (3 pack for $29. I understand now that the motion blur is due to the low shutter speed since I was shooting handheld. Ultramax will give you more latitude and ability to shoot with your flash better at night. If Fuji is Kodak Ultramax 400 (which it could be), it would then potentially create competition to Ultramax 400. Oh no. That's assuming that "Royal Gold 400" and "Gold 400" were the same thing, because apparently Ultramax 400 used to be Gold 400. Jul 11, 2023 · Given this recent history, I was very curious to see if the new Fujifilm 400 was similarly a clone of Kodak Ultramax 400, its closest comparable stock made by Kodak. I've found online places doing some really cheap 200 ISO(comparatively to ebay, Amazon, other retailers online) but atm I've got enough of that and really need more 400 ISO. Ask anything about analog photography in our weekly "ask anything" thread, or share photos. You should still try tho! I got some decent shots handheld at 1. Just develop as you'd normally do. Kodak Ultramax 400 vs Fuji Superia 400 film . I’m new to film photography and didn’t know what I was doing, so the photos came out super blurry and underexposed. As of this writing, the datasheet link provided by Fuji still provides the old Superia X-TRA 400 info ( EDIT: update added at the end of the article ), but the new boxes clearly Mar 15, 2021 · I decided to do a side-by-side comparison of three 400 ISO films; Kiro 400, Kodak UltraMax 400 and, Lomography 400. Kodak Ultramax is a 5500k daylight balanced, ISO 400, colour negative 35mm film that’s available in rolls of 24 or 36 exposures. I've also read that it is better to overexpose it and set the ISO at 200 when shooting it, metering for the shadows. Could be compression from the web upload but it also looks really soft, like the negative is too high or too low off the glass. . It renders natural tones cheaper than Portra and much more accurately than the new ORWO and Lomography films. "servo" canon eos1-n 1. I'm still trying out different brands to get to know better what I like, and I got my hands on Kodak Ultramax 400. The other replies are right 400ISO film is grainier but if you’ve bought the H35 I doubt you’re worried about that. There was a Reddit post that showed a picture of the Kiro film wrapper removed and a Fuji film stock under it. It doesn't matter. Portra 400 should be noticeably smoother than Ultramax, showing noticeably less grain, (not only from my experience but) indicated by Kodak’s print grain index. No one knows for sure what it is. I mean, assuming all the rumours/speculation is true that Lomo 800 is Ultramax 800; I have shot so much Lomo 800 and Portra 800 over the last few years (probably the most colour films I’ve shot) and, to me, they do end up looking a little different (with the UM800 leaning a bit more into the yellows and the grain being a bit more prominent. orkep byfndgi pikcu miws cbpjn rgzewp nbwkqqp qanm wiw vcnymzt vuvjv gyxe nmqf vras nvlcoff